Natural World Evaluation Rubric
Courses with NW designation address all of the learning outcomes.
| Learning Outcome | Unsatisfactory | Satisfactory | Exemplary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical and/or experimental background of a particular topic or model, sufficient to form or identify a hypothesis. | Example fails to provide a scientific foundation for model or hypothesis – or uses model or hypothesis incorrectly. | Example presents a scientific model or hypothesis, but does not thoroughly explain. | Example presents a scientific model or hypothesis, connecting it to experimental results, historical studies/literature, or historical interpretations. |
| Demonstrate an ability to critically analyze scientific results discussing strengths and weaknesses. | Example fails to critically analyze results. | Critically analyzes the results, but does not provide adequate detail on strengths and weaknesses. | Example recognizes the strengths and weaknesses within a model or hypothesis then critically analyzes results based on evidence. |
| Demonstrate how scientific results can be extended to more general situations in contemporary society. | Example fails to coherently convey how discoveries can be applied more broadly. | Example attempts to extend results more broadly, but is unclear or is lacking depth. | Example clearly conveys how a given technology or discovery can impact other similar situations or discoveries. |